Ineffective accounts receivable management at Vietnam Airport Ground Service Company Limited

TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ 1 LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 2 1. PROBLEM CONTEXT .............................................................................................. 3 1.1 Company overview...................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Problem context........................................................................................................... 5 2. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................ 7 2.1 Possible problems........................................................................................................ 7 2.1.1 Poor account receivable management.................................................................. 10 2.1.2 Poor account payable negotiation........................................................................ 11 2.1.3 Overinvestment in equipment ............................................................................. 11 2.2 Main problem validation............................................................................................ 13 2.3 Main problem definition and its consequences........................................................... 16 2.3.1 Main problem definition ..................................................................................... 16 2.3.2 Consequences .................................................................................................... 17 3. CAUSE VALIDATIONS .............................................................................................. 18 3.1 Possible causes .......................................................................................................... 18 3.1.1 Poor credit policy................................................................................................ 18 3.1.2 Weak credit assessment ability............................................................................ 19 3.1.3 Poor communication with customers on receivables............................................ 20 3.2 Cause validation ........................................................................................................ 21 3.2.1 Real causes ......................................................................................................... 21 3.2.2 Main cause ......................................................................................................... 23 4. SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS......................................................................................... 24 4.1 Alternative solutions.................................................................................................. 24 4.1.1 Credit standard issuance..................................................................................... 24 4.1.2 Apply discount to payment of customers............................................................. 26 4.1.3 Using bank guarantees to secure the debt collection process ............................... 27 4.2 Solution justification ................................................................................................. 29 4.3 Action plan for the organization ................................................................................ 29 5. SUPPORTING INFORMATION................................................................................. 32 5.1 Summary of research methods in the study ................................................................ 32 5.3 Interview transcripts .................................................................................................. 33 References.......................................................................................................................... 40 APPENDIX 1..................................................................................................................... 43 APPENDIX 2..................................................................................................................... 44 APPENDIX 3..................................................................................................................... 45 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Organization structure of VIAGS in December 2019 Figure 2. Fluctuations in DSO, DIO and DPO of VIAGS and SAGS over the years Figure 3. The initial cause-effect map Figure 4. Fluctuations in short-term trade receivables of customer groups over the years Figure 5. The cause and effect map LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Categories of service provided by VIAGS Table 2. Net revenue and net profit after tax of VIAGS Table 3. Cash flow from operations of VIAGS Table 4. Net working capital of VIAGS Table 5. Net working capital of SAGS Table 6. Cash conversion cycle of VIAGS Table 7. Cash conversion cycle of SAGS Table 8. Fixed assets of VIAGS Table 9. The account receivables aging of VIAGS Table 10. Short-term trade receivables structure by customer groups 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The study has approached the problem of Vietnam Airport Ground Services Co., Ltd. starting with a situation where the company has experienced a decrease in working capital in the last 3 years. This greatly affects the cash flow and performance of company because of the negative impact it has. Through secondary data provided by the company, interviews with relevant people in the company and searching for related theories, the author realized that there were a number of factors leading to this situation, of which the main problem is identified as the inefficiency in receivables management. The receivables of company mainly comes from credit sales. However, customers' payment periods for credits tend to be extended. Going further to find out the causes of the problem, the three most prominent ones are the ineffective credit policy, weak credit assessment ability and poor communication with customer. After analysis, the main cause was determined by the company's lack of effective credit policies to control credit issuance and monitor customer payments. To address this cause, the best solution is to issue a strict set of credit standards. With this solution, the company hopes to tighten the conditions to apply credit to customers, thereby reducing the working capital needed to finance accounts receivable, reduce costs to maintain accounts receivable, and especially reducing the risk of bad debt. The global economy has many fluctuations, especially in the coming years, after the Coronavirus pandemic occurred in the early months of 2020 and showed no signs of stopping until now. Airlines - customers of VIAGS - suffered heavy losses unprecedented in history. Within the last 2 months, many airlines in the world have fallen into financial exhaustion and even went bankrupt. And so, for VIAGS, the risk of bad debt from customers is likely to increase and be unpredictable in the near future. Faced with these difficulties, tightening credit standards is expected to help the company maintain safety and stability. 2 1. PROBLEM CONTEXT 1.1 Company overview Vietnam Airport Ground Services Company (VIAGS) is a subsidiary of Vietnam Airlines, which was established on January 1, 2016, on the basis of merging 3 ground service enterprises in Hanoi, Da Nang and Ho Chi Minh City including: NIAGS, DIAGS, and TIAGS. VIAGS provide synchronous and international standard ground services to nearly 70 airline customers at 04 international airports from North to South of Vietnam. After more than 25 years of development of enterprises and 4 years of establishment of VIAGS, the company currently has more than 4,500 skillful staff who are professionally-trained from basic to advanced levels along with modern equipment system which is operated according to the highest safety and quality standards, meeting ISO 9001: 2015 and ISAGO standards. The head office of company is located at Tan Son Nhat airport, HCM city. Currently, the company has 3 branches including VIAGS Noi Bai, VIAGS Da Nang, VIAGS Tan Son Nhat, and one affiliated company, which is Aviation Ground Services Co. Ltd, (AGS) with a 25% stake. The company's vision is to be the top of Vietnam in the field of airport ground services in the short-term, then become the leading ranking organization providing consistent and accordant solutions in South East Asia in 2022 and in Asia in 2027. After ten years, VIAGS will be the leading organization for providing innovative solution in the field of ground transportation services and business development. The mission of the company is to provide quality aviation services in accordance with international standards meeting the ever-increasing needs of our clients through an effective corporate governance system and advanced resources. In addition, as a comprehensive community, VIAGS provides innovative solutions in the aviation service industry to bring a differentiated experience to organizations, customers, communities and society. The organization structure is presented as following: 3 BOARD OF MANAGEMENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DEPUTY GENERAL DIRECTOR DEPUTY GENERAL DIRECTOR Accounting & Fina nce De pa rtm e nt S a le s & Ma rke ting De pa rtm e nt S a fe ty & Qua lity As s ura nce De pa rtm e nt Tra ining C e nte r Pa rty Orga nis a tion & Union Office Hum a n Re s ource s De pa rtm e nt P la nning & Inve s tm e nt De pa rtm e nt Se rvice s S ta nda rd De pa rtm e nt Adm inis tra tion De pa rtm e nt VIAGS NOI BAI (VIAGS - NBA) BRANC H VIAGS DA NANG (VIAG S - DAD) BRANC H VIAGS TAN S ON NHAT (VIAGS - TS N) BRANC H Figure 1. Organization structure of VIAGS in December 2019 (Source: company documents) Services are offered by the company as follows: Category of services Details Core services - Passenger and baggage handling services - Ramp services - Load control and flight operation services - Station management services - Cargo and mail warehouse services - Executive aviation services - Training services - Repair and maintenance services Supplementary services - Baggage delivery services - Office and warehouse renting - Crew transportation - Personal Transceiver renting … Table 1. Categories of service provided by VIAGS 4 VIAGS has two types of services provided to customers. The first type is core services, which are ground services that directly serve customer flights. Core services create the main revenue source for the company. The second type is additional services, which are related services and support for customer. 1.2 Problem context Although the company has only been established for only 4 years, since 2016, on the basis of merging 3 enterprises which are currently the branches, these branches have operated independently for 23 years. The company's financial statements show that the net revenue and net profit after tax grow over the years from 2016 to 2019. The figures are shown in the following table: Unit: million VND 2019 2018 2017 2016 Net revenue 2,204,771 2,038,983 1,851,474 1,633,127 Growth rate 108% 110% 113% - Net profit after tax 159,850 148,913 132,109 105,331 Growth rate 107% 113% 125% - (Income statement of VIAGS) Table 2. Net revenue and net profit after tax of VIAGS However, the growth rate of them has shown a negative sign as it decreases over the years. In details, the revenue increased from 1,633,127 million VND in 2016 to 2,204,771 million VND in 2019. During this period, the growth rate of revenue decreased gradually from 113% to 108%. Similarly for profit after tax, although the value increased from 105,331 million VND to 159,850 million VND, the growth rate has decreased sharply from 125% to 107%. Assessing the cash flow from operating activities of the company, in general, cash flow has grown in the last 3 years thanks to the growth of profit before tax. However, the fluctuations of cash flow from receivables shows the bad signs that the company needs to assess. Unlike cash flow from inventory and accounts payable, inventory cash flow has continuously decreased over the years, reflecting that customers are tying up more capital from the company and so the company owned less cash. 5 Unit: million VND 2019 2018 2017 2019/ 2018 2018/ 2017 Profit before tax 198,368 187,733 167,417 6% 12% Decrease in trade receivables (48,074) (41,609) (29,153) 16% 43% Decrease in inventories 2,231 5,883 4,174 -62% 41% Decrease in trade payables (35,521) 75,136 (13,504) -147% 656% Cash generated from operations 177,753 141,491 98,651 26% 43% (Cash flow statement of VIAGS) Table 3. Cash flow from operations of VIAGS Changes in the working capital of company over the years have shown signs that need to be concerned which is illustrated at below table: Unit: million VND VIAGS 2019 2018 2017 Net working capital (million VND) 45,187 83,598 107,618 Growth rate -46% -22% 68% Table 4. Net working capital of VIAGS After the first year the company was officially put into operation, the working capital decreased rapidly. The working capital of 2018 has decreased by 22% compared to that of 2019. In 2019, working capital has decreased by 46% compared to 2018. Compared to Saigon Ground Service JSC (SAGS), VIAGS's main competitor, the working capital SAGS are larger than VIAGS and tend to increase over the years from 2016. The figures are shown in the following table: Unit: million VND SAGS 2019 2018 2017 Net working capital (million VND) 536,834 390,644 191,482 Growth rate 37% 104% 37% Table 5. Net working capital of SAGS The negative trend of VIAGS's working capital for 3 consecutive years has indicated the bad symptoms that the company needs to be considered in managing it. According to the 6 literature, net working capital is defined as the difference between current assets and current liabilities [1]. Another definition of net working capital is part of a company's long-term capital financing current assets [1]. Positive working capital exists in a situation when the current assets are higher than current liabilities. Overall, the operational security of a company is ensured by positive net working capital. Management of working capital is very important because it impacts directly on profitability of a firm [1]. Working capital management is defined as financing current assets and managing current assets and current liabilities of firm [2]. Working capital management is a company's short-term financial requirement. In general, if working capital is insufficient, it leads to liquidity problems and then it can disrupt the production process and ultimately reduce profits [3]. But on the other hand, holding excess working capital result reduces profit because idle funds that do not generate any return for the firm [3]. As such, effective working capital management is the company's goal as it helps the company maintain appropriate working capital and pay off obligations promptly. On the contrary, the inefficiency in working capital management will bring some undesirable consequences for the company such as liquidity risk, lack of attraction to investors, difficulty in expanding the business and risk of financial tightening from suppliers or banks [4]. In summary, company needs to maintain an optimal level of the components of its working capital to maximize its financial health. To gain a deeper understanding of the cause of symptom, a working capital analysis will be conducted. 2. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION 2.1 Possible problems According to the working capital management definition mentioned, it involves management decisions about important components of financial management for a firm including cash, inventory, account receivables and payables. According to Raheman and Nasr (2007), the cash conversion cycle (CCC) is a popular measurement of working capital management [5]. CCC is defined as the time lag between purchase of raw materials to collection of cash from sale of good or service rendered [1]. Cash Conversion Cycle is a useful technique by which firm can easily and quickly assess its liquidity [6]. Compared to the evaluation of liquidity through liquidity ratios such as current ratio and quick ratio in the traditional way, CCC is a dynamic measure of continuous liquidity management, which comprises both balance sheet and income statement data with time dimension [6]. A longer CCC will result in greater investment in working capital and vice versa [7]. Thus, a positive cash conversion cycle 7 indicates that the time the company is borrowing is less than the waiting time for payment from customers [7]. In other words, the smaller cash conversion cycle is expected because it indicates the organization has quickly recovered cash from the sale of its products. The more cash in hand, the more liquidity the company has [6]. In contrast, negative CCC implies the time the company receives cash from sales before they have to pay its suppliers [8]. It means a high cash conversion cycle indicates that the company takes more time to collect cash. And so a high cash conversion cycle is undesirable because it points to liquidity issues. In summary, the relationship of CCC with profitability is a significant negative correlation [9]. The lower CCC is, the better for the company. In other words, the goal of firm is to minimize its CCC, because the shorter the CCC indicates the more effective the company is in managing its cash flow [6]. CCC has three components including days sales outstanding (DSO), days inventory outstanding (DIO) and days payable outstanding (DPO). Cash Conversion Cycle is calculated by deducting the payable deferral period from adding inventory conversion period and receivable collection period [6]. So, the formula is: CCC = DIO + DSO - DPO. The analysis results of company’s CCC and its components are shown in the following table: Unit: days VIAGS 2019 2018 2017 2019/2018 2018/2017 Days sales outstanding (DSO) 50 44 41 114% 106% Days inventory outstanding (DIO) 8 11 12 73% 85% Days payable outstanding (DPO) 24 31 34 77% 92% Cash conversion cycle (CCC = DSO + DIO - DPO) 34 24 20 143% 117% Table 6. Cash conversion cycle of VIAGS Figures show that CCC has increased significantly in the last 3 years. In 2017, the average time for money conversion was 20 days, but by 2019, the time was 34 days, an increase of 70% compared to 2017. Thus, the time for the company to recover money has increased sharply year by year. That shows a bad sign in the company's working capital management. To explore further, CCC components, including DIO, DSO and DPO, will be analyzed. The figures shows that all three components have all changed that significantly leading to the increase of CCC. In particular, based on the correlation between CCC and its components as 8 well as the fluctuations of these components, it can be seen that the fluctuations of DIO has a positive impact on CCC while the fluctuations of DSO and DPO have a negative impact. The efficiency ratios of the company's main competitors and graphs comparing these indicators between the two companies over the years are shown in the following: Unit: days SAGS 2019 2018 2017 2019/2018 2018/2017 Days sales outstanding (DSO) 56 53 58 106% 91% Days inventory outstanding (DIO) 3 3 3 100% 100% Days payable outstanding (DPO) 21 26 26 81% 100% Cash conversion cycle (CCC = DSO + DIO - DPO) 38 30 35 127% 86% Table 7. Cash conversion cycle of SAGS Figure 2. Fluctuations in DSO, DIO and DPO of VIAGS and SAGS over the years The figures and graph indicate that the fluctuations of competitors' days sales outstanding, days inventory outstanding and days payable outstanding are quite stable, most of which are lower than that of VIAGS in each year. Accordingly, DIO is defined as the time taken to convert inventory held into sales [1]. Cost of inventory tends to increase if inventory period (DIO) increases [10]. Therefore, the purpose of inventory management is to minimize these costs without causing disruption in the production [1]. The DIO of VIAGS has been steadily declining for the past 3 years, from 12 days in 2017 to 9 days in 2019. This is a good signal in 9 inventory management. However, the proportion as well as the fluctuations of DIO for CCC is relatively small compared to the other two components. Therefore, although having a positive impact on CCC, DIO cannot compensate for the negative impact from these two indicators. 2.1.1 Poor account receivable management Receivables management is defined as the actions of sellers to balance the attraction of new customers by loosening trade credit policies and limiting the risk of allowing late payments from unreliable buyers [11]. The management decisions of the seller shape the level and quality of receivables [11]. The accounts receivable management must be based on three main factors including the trade credit term which is the maximum delay possible in the payment of customers; time of payment by cash discount of customers; and the cash discount rate. In particular, the maximum time to delay payment for customers is also the maximum period of the account receivable cycle for the company. The management of accounts receivable directly affects firm performance. When accounts receivable are kept at a level that offers an advantage over a drawbacks, the company's performance will increase. Receivables management requires a careful consideration. In the event that the seller has too much money bound in accounts receivable due to an extreme free trade credit policy, it will cause a burden on the company due to higher costs of accounts receivable service It is the additional cost generated by bad debts from risky customers. [11]. However, the benefit it brings is increased capital inflows from cash revenue. In contrast, more restrictive policies have lower costs due to smaller operating costs for managing receivables, but they carry a higher operational risk. In term of the DSO, which is defined as the average number of days from the moment that firm issues the sales invoice until receiving of the payment [9]. Dhar, Saptarshi. (2018) stated that increase in DSO generally reflects poor collection efforts [1]. In other words, a negative association between the account receivables and profitability of the firm indicates that a higher level of accounts receivables lead to an increase of the cash gap, and then reduce the working capital [15]. Therefore, it’s favorable for the companies to minimize the level of the receivables collection period to maximize the shareholder’s wealth [15]. The days sales outstanding in 2017 was 51 days, this number has increased sharply to 71 days in 2019. Within 3 years, the average time to collect payment from customers after sales of the company has increased to 39%. Thus, the company's fluctuations in DSO have shown inefficiencies in account receivable management. 10 2.1.2 Poor account payable negotiation Payable accounts represent a company's obligation to pay a short-term debt to its creditors or suppliers [12]. Thus, the account payable is a payment of short-term debt that the company needs to pay to avoid default. In fact, accounts payable is often seen as a secondary action when businesses seek to develop or build a competitive advantage. That is, it is not a central issue, but instead, it is only ranked behind in management's competing priorities of the company [13]. However, when optimizing working capital, increasing payables should be considered as a core strategy [13]. Many businesses tend to extend the maturity of their accounts as long as possible because this has the obvious benefit for businesses that maximize the free cash flow. However, this approach is not always effective. The reason for this is that delaying payments may reduce supplier goodwill, leading to supplier troubles such as tight payment terms, longer delivery times and the longer respond to the requirements [13]. On the contrary, early payment can bring significant benefits such as a discount applied by the supplier for early payment. The third component of CCC is DPO, which is defined as the time lag between arrival of stock to the company and payment of cash to suppliers for the materials [1]. A higher value of DPO implies that the company takes longer to pay its bills, so it can retain the available funds for a longer duration, meaning the company can hold more working capital [16]. However, if payment period is too high, it may cause suppliers dissatisfaction, leading to loss of good suppliers. In addition, the company may lose trade incentives applied when the company pays early. Therefore, the management of reasonable payment times is the goal of companies to balance between fulfilling payment responsibilities to suppliers and optimizing working capital. In the case of VIAGS, DPO has gradually decreased over the years: 34 days in 2017 and 24 days in 2019. Within 3 years, the average time to take payment to suppliers has decreased by 29%. One of the main reasons for this decline is that in 2019, the company terminated a high-value contract with the supplier. The value of the contract accounts for about 11% of the total short-term trade accounts payable. The decline of the short-term trade accounts payable has led to a decline in DPO. 2.1.3 Overinvestment in equipment An organization that wants to make a profit needs investment. Investment is presented through the purchase of an asset or an item for the purpose of generating income. Investing is not about trading goods or services today, but about making a profit in the future. Thus, 11 investment is defined as spending money to buy an asset or to work to start a project, and put them into operation with the goal of generating income and increasing value over time [14]. Forms of investment include assets, credit, real estate and financial markets. The investment is aimed at future income, so it also carries risks. Specifically, the risk comes from the investment not pan out or falls short. With more than 25 years of existence and development, along with long-term vision and goals, after being incorporated and officially put into operation in 2016 the company has focused on investing in equipment that directly serves its business to increase productivity and competitiveness. In 2019, the company's net working capital was negative, indicating that the company used working capital to invest in long-term assets. In particular, equipment procurement accounted for the largest proportion. Within 3 years, the value of equipment has increased by 149%. The residual value of the equipment at the end of the years from 2016 to 2019 is shown in the table below: Unit: million VND 2019 2018 2017 2016 Fixed Assets 393,540 272,023 239,075 191,798 Equipment 218,526 104,182 87,643 39,506 Table 8. Fixed assets of VIAGS From the above analysis, it can be seen that there are three possible problems leading to a decline in working capital that the company is facing. They are ineffective management of account receivables, non-optimization of paying suppliers, and unsuitable investment in equipment. 12 Trade credit policy Ability to assess bad debt of employees. Communication with customers Ending a big supplier contract Taking early settlement discounts Poor accounts receivable management Poor account payable negotiation Overinvestment in equipment Bad debts Decreasing in working capital Liquidity risk Lack of attraction to investors Difficulty in expanding business The risk of financial tightening from suppliers / banks. Figure 3. The initial cause-effect map 2.2 Main problem validation Overinvestment in equipment At VIAGS, strong investment in equipment over the past 3 years has adversely affected the company's working capital. To find out the reason for this investment, an in-depth interview with the Mr. Hung – the General Manager of Planning and Investment department - was conducted. He said the establishment of the company has restructured the operation model of the three enterprises before. Thereby also changing the relationship between the parent company - Vietnam Airlines and VIAGS. Including the provision of equipment for business operation. Specifically, in the past, the parent company was in charge of procurement and then handed over the equipment to factories for use. Therefore, this cost belongs to the parent company. After VIAGS was established, the parent company did not purchase equipment for VIAGS anymore, instead the company had to make the purchase by itself. That explains the significant investment in equipment in recent years. In order to ensure service provision, long-term development and increase competitiveness, this investment is considered mandatory and prerequisite. Therefore, overinvestment is not considered as one of the problems causing the decrease in working capital. 13 Poor account payable negotiation As mentioned, the company's days payable outstanding decreased over the years. In 2018 compared to 2017, the average payment time for suppliers decreased by 8%. In 2019, the decrease was 23% compared to 2018. The main reasons for this decline is that in 2019, the company terminated a high-value contract with the supplier. The value of the contract accounts for about 11% of the total short-term trade accounts payable. The decline of the short-term trade accounts payable has led to a decline in payable accounts, and thereby reducing the days payable outstanding. In addition, the fluctuation of days payable outstanding within 24 - 34 days is consistent with the payment time agreed in all contracts with suppliers, usually from 20-30 days. The decrease in days payable outstanding also shows the efforts of company in fulfilling payment obligations to suppliers. Therefore, the decline of days payable outstanding, although affecting cash conversion cycle, is not considered as a problem of the company. Poor accounts receivable management Currently, in the company's customer structure, there are two main customer groups. The first group consists of the parent company – Vietnam Airlines and the companies that are subsidiaries or afiliates of VNA. The second group is the foreign airlines that VIAGS is providing ground services for. Assessing the age of account receivables of each group at December 31, 2019, the figures are shown in the table below: Unit: million VND 1 to 30 days 31 to 60 days 61 to 90 days 90 days to 6 months Over 6 months Total Group 1 92,355 130,677 5,675 - - 228,707 % / Total 40% 57% 2% 0% 0% Group 2 40,260 73,641 6,825 2,424 - 123,150 % / Total 33% 60% 6% 2% 0% Table 9. The account receivables aging of VIAGS The figures indicated that the company is having difficulty in controlling the time to collect money from account receivables of both customer groups. The age of accounts receivables of the two groups is most concentrated at 31 to 60 days level: 57% of group 1 and 60% of group 14 2. The second largest age group is 1 to 30 days level. In this, group 1 has 40% accounts and group 2 has 33%. Age from 61 to 90 days has 2% of group 1 and 6% of group 2. In addition, while group 1 has no account receivables from 90 days to 6 months level, group 2 has 2% at this. In summary, receivables from customers in group 2 are older than group 1. The accounts receivable structure of the two groups of customers over the year is shown in the following table: Unit: million VND Short-term trade receivables 2019 % / Total 2018 % / Total 2017 % / Total Group 1 228,707 65% 178,720 71% 176,410 74% Group 2 123,150 35% 74,366 29% 61,679 26% Total 351,857 100% 253,085 100% 238,089 100% Table 10. Short-term trade receivables structure by customer groups Figure 4. Fluctuations in short-term trade receivables of customer groups over the years Figures and graphs show that the proportion of group 2's account receivables to total short- term trade receivables has increased over the year (26%, 29%, 35%). In contrast, the proportion of group 2 has decreased (74%, 71%, 65%). Thus, along with the increase in short-term trade receivables, it can be seen that the account receivables of group 2 had a higher growth rate than group 1 so it has increased faster than group 1. Moreover, the 15 increased value after 3 years of group 2 is also greater than that of group 1 (61,471 vs 52,297 million VND). In summary, the company is having difficulty in managing and controlling the amount of accounts receivable and the time to recover money from customers, especially the customer group is foreign airlines. This is the main problem that causes inefficiencies in working capital management. 2.3 Main problem definition and its consequences 2.3.1 Main problem definition Accounts receivable is the amount owed to a company as selling its goods or services to customers on credit [17]. Typically companies sell goods and services to customers in both cash and credit. In particular, cash is always preferred because when paying cash means customers have fulfilled their obligations to the company. In contrast, when selling with trade credit, the company will not receive money from the customer immediately unless and until the account is collected. However, competitive pressure forces the companies to provide credit to attract customers. In other words, although handling receivables need to cost more, it also brings an important benefit that is increasing sales [17]. The application of trade credit requires the establishment of receivables. Receivables represent credit sales that the company has not yet collected from customers. Only when customers complete these payments, the company can settle this account, if customers do not pay, a bad debt will occur. Thus, when a receivables is created, there will be both good and bad points. The good point is the company has more sales and customers. The bad point is that the company cannot collect the money immediately and there is a risk that it cannot be collected. That requires the company to have a system to manage the accounts receivable. The objective of receivables management is to maximize the company's profitability by achieving a balance between liquidity and risk [18]. Cash flow is very important for the company because it is the engine that drives the business to operate and grow, but overdue accounts can act as the brakes that stop the engine [18]. Therefore, it requires accounts receivable should be managed efficiently so that the business of the company would not be constrained. Effective receivables management and the ability to collect credits are a prerequisite for a company to sell on credit without compromising its liquidity. 16